Head of CAP on U.S. Competitiveness in Global Energy

ALERT

If you are unable to watch videos, that means you either have JavaScript turned off in your web browser or you have an old version of Adobe's Flash Player.

About this video

Clean Skies News sits down with John Podesta, President of the Center for American Progress, to talk about where the U.S. is in terms of global energy competitiveness.  Podesta says the U.S. is ranked 19th in per capita spending on clean energy.  He cites development in solar energy in particular as having dropped off significantly since Podesta served in the White House under President Clinton.  Podesta says the key is to put a policy framework in place to drive investment forward.

Related Items

Now on Clean Skies

Top Stories

A deal between BMW & the Carbon Motors company strives to green police vehicles.

Cop Cars Go Green

Comments (2)

U.S. is ranked 19th in per

U.S. is ranked 19th in per capita spending on clean energy. Development in solar energy in particular as having dropped off significantly since ... hope there will be an improvement in going for clean energy...Automative Film

Taxing Up the cost of Energy

Taxing Up the cost of Energy to Tilt the US Energy Playing Field will not itself produce more US jobs or magically create economic prosperity,

Making energy more expensive will tend to depress the already struggling economy and make all products built with or delivered to market with energy more expensive, which is intrinsically inflationary.

Eighty five percent of current US industrial activity is driven by use of energy produced from fossil fuels. Asking taxpayer to subsidize immature renewable technologies with feed in tariffs and preferential tax arrangements is contra-economic and will result in continuing to shed middle class jobs until leadership begins to understand that their green goals come at significant cost to the economy.

Future carbon emissions will not come primarily from the currently industrialized world, but from the emerging economies, especially China. Future Green House Gas emissions from the developing economies in Asia will totally swamp reductions achieved at significant economic sacrifice in the West. In recent Copenhagen climate debates, China, which currently emits 30% more CO2 per year than the U.S., has not promised to cut actual emissions.

Costly 80% cuts in U.S. emissions will produce only a tiny benefit. The bulk of our effort is best directed at helping the emerging economies conserve energy and move rapidly toward efficient solar, wind and nuclear power. Developing cheap carbon capture and sequestration is also a priority. Above all, we need to recognize that make-the-West-bear-the-burden Copenhagen proposals are meaningless and completely ineffective.

Professor Richard Muller of UC Berkeley has prepared an important analysis that should be brought to the awareness of decision makers. Information regarding how crucial the new developing economies in Asia are to averting climate catastrophe has been compiled into an article by Professor Muller which can be found at:

http://www.mullerandassociates.com/nakedcopenhagendetail.php